Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[LotusBud]

I'm sure that's only true for the "alt righties" here though.

Not the others who come here everyday even though they hate the population, think everyone not them is too stupid to talk to and wont engage in anything beyond partisan insults and media parroting. That's like the apex of mental health.

Hopefully I can get there someday.

Have you ever noticed that every single time you post, you describe your own behavior, Dove? It's like you're writing an autobiography now.

 

[Dove]

I'm sure that's only true for the "alt righties" here though.

Not the others who come here everyday even though they hate the population, think everyone not them is too stupid to talk to and wont engage in anything beyond partisan insults and media parroting. That's like the apex of mental health.

Hopefully I can get there someday.

Have you ever noticed that every single time you post, you describe your own behavior, Dove? It's like you're writing an autobiography now.

I notice how you guys consistently describe your own behaviour and say "No YUO" everytime someone calls it.

I'm not the only one who has called you guys projectionist and how you do exactly everything you accuse us of. Even down to complaining about how we talk about "libs" and lump you all together even though you constantly do that to us. Or that we are "hateful" because we now throw insults right back after being insulted repeatedly.

People have openly observed the lack of self awareness. Its stunning.

Are you gonna be big enough to admit Kyle defended himself? I would be. I know you also said that if that girl was really raped you would care. But you havent. Even after a rape kit and another victim and charges.

 

[Joe]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

 

[Joe]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

 

[Murdy]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

These riots they all piss and moan about daily resulted from police brutality against the peaceful protestors while they were still peaceful… and all we were asking for was an investigation into the Floyd matter.

But the racist ass cops are going to “protect their own” and it erupted into riots.

They (the far right) don’t want to recognize they racism exists and act like they are in complete denial because it’s a dirty little secret passed down from generation to generation in these formerly known as pore white trash families. White trash is no longer a social economical distinction in the US.

 

[Dove]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

Well when you already have a narrative, you'll see what you want to see. And you'll selectively chose info you need for a confirmation bias.

The facts are Kyle didnt break the law. He shot white who WERE breaking the law and attacking him.

I think it's sad you chose to join the race cult logic and that's gonna require to ignore A LOT of details in order to continue thinking that.

So if only white people get acquitted when they defend themselves.....what happened with Coffee, Joe? He shot at police in self defense and his claim to self defense held up to the evidence.

Should Coffee be charged with something? Or should just Kyle be convicted even though he broke no laws?

I think I should start a thread for you, Joe. That strictly lists a plethora of successful self defense claims by all kinds of different colored people.

Hopefully at some point you'll understand domestic terror against communities is horrible and people have a right to protect themselves when siege is upon them. And it's not about race....but human rights.

 

[Dove]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

No such thing as an "assault weapon" and the AR 15 is a long gun by WI laws.

 

[Joe]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

These riots they all piss and moan about daily resulted from police brutality against the peaceful protestors while they were still peaceful… and all we were asking for was an investigation into the Floyd matter.

But the racist ass cops are going to “protect their own” and it erupted into riots.

They (the far right) don’t want to recognize they racism exists and act like they are in complete denial because it’s a dirty little secret passed down from generation to generation in these formerly known as pore white trash families. White trash is no longer a social economical distinction in the US.

They appeared to hold their ground.

I wonder how much fudging the Rittenhouse legal defense team got from outside sources and from whom.

 

[Joe]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

No such thing as an "assault weapon" and the AR 15 is a long gun by WI laws.

Well I read an article about the legislators who drafted those laws and one them said it was never intended to include weapons like the AR 15.

But traditional hunting rifles.

So I believe that is a misinterpretation of the law and probably deliberate on Judge Schroeder's part.

 

[Dove]

Hey Joe...myou know who else walked due to reasonable self defense?

Breona Taylor's boyfriend.

How did that happen? He isnt white. Wow. HOW? I though only white people walked when they didnt break the law.

How are these black people walking when its found they broke no law?

Fucking crazy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I mean it's almost like Americans have the basic human and constitutional RIGHTS to defend themselves.

That CANT really be it, though right? It's because "wyt supremacy". Cuz you guys say so.

 

[Murdy]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

These riots they all piss and moan about daily resulted from police brutality against the peaceful protestors while they were still peaceful… and all we were asking for was an investigation into the Floyd matter.

But the racist ass cops are going to “protect their own” and it erupted into riots.

They (the far right) don’t want to recognize they racism exists and act like they are in complete denial because it’s a dirty little secret passed down from generation to generation in these formerly known as pore white trash families. White trash is no longer a social economical distinction in the US.

They appeared to hold their ground.

I wonder how much fudging the Rittenhouse legal defense team got from outside sources and from whom.

Wisconsin is just another state that has been bamboozled into thinking that becoming a RepubliTARD will save our nation, despite being the working class exploited by the RepubliTARDS.

Most of them lack the depth and intellect to see through the lies of the right…

I say it’s shifting us more into a totalitarian dictatorship than ever.

 

[Dove]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

No such thing as an "assault weapon" and the AR 15 is a long gun by WI laws.

Well I read an article about the legislators who drafted those laws and one of them who drafted the laws and it was never intended to include weapons like the AR 15.

But traditional hunting rifles.

So I believe that is a misinterpretation of the law and probably deliberate on Judge Schroeder's part.

Well by law in WI the gun was a long gun by the standards they drafted.

Maybe people more educated in firearms and constitutional rights should be making the laws.

But you still cant convict someone when they were within the law.

 

[Murdy]

someone took their crazy pulled today……

wheeeeeeeeee

 

[Murdy]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

No such thing as an "assault weapon" and the AR 15 is a long gun by WI laws.

Well I read an article about the legislators who drafted those laws and one of them who drafted the laws and it was never intended to include weapons like the AR 15.

But traditional hunting rifles.

So I believe that is a misinterpretation of the law and probably deliberate on Judge Schroeder's part.

The Judge was highly criticized by legal scholars for doing so.

He was also criticized for refusing to allow the murdered/injured to be referred to as victims.

I am hopeful that most will realize this kid could have served 60 years and that will deter them from pulling another stunt like this again. Unless they are complete mental tards, which most of them are.

 

[Blurt]

"Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance".

Boy how TRUE is that. These drooling fascist sociopaths think they can ignore all details and nuance and destroy our rights and politically weaponize the judicial system.

It's like they are either psycho level pathological liars or they are really THIS fucking braindead and dont understand the difference between assault and self defense. Which makes them so stupid they are a danger and threat to the country.

These establishment shills are trying to rile up their mindless base. They know their followers are dumb and easily led by the nose and will accept all kinds of disgusting anti American violence if its framed right. And they know their followers wont check shit. Theyll just go with what they are told.

This ain't even right/left. Its Americans against the corporate political establishment.

That quote explains a lot of their bullshit.

A very nuanced post, Dovey.

 

[LotusBud]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

He was very biased toward the defense. Appalling.

 

[Dove]

"Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance".

Boy how TRUE is that. These drooling fascist sociopaths think they can ignore all details and nuance and destroy our rights and politically weaponize the judicial system.

It's like they are either psycho level pathological liars or they are really THIS fucking braindead and dont understand the difference between assault and self defense. Which makes them so stupid they are a danger and threat to the country.

These establishment shills are trying to rile up their mindless base. They know their followers are dumb and easily led by the nose and will accept all kinds of disgusting anti American violence if its framed right. And they know their followers wont check shit. Theyll just go with what they are told.

This ain't even right/left. Its Americans against the corporate political establishment.

That quote explains a lot of their bullshit.

A very nuanced post, Dovey.

It's more an observation. It fits.

It's not like I was making an insane comparison that ignores critical info like "omg we can shoot people with skateboard now!" As if assaulting someone with one is the same as just having it.

Nuance wasnt intended in my observation that none of you understand nuance. Which should be clear and probably is to everyone else.

I'll mark my posts in future so you know what you are reading.

 

[Oerdin]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

Jesus Christ, that is a stupid take. The law doesn't care if it is semi-automatic, bolt action, or a muzzle loader. It specifically says to be counted as a long rifle the barrel must be 16" in length and 25" long from butt to muzzle tip. That is it.

Why not try reading the law in question, like I and many others actually did, so you can learn what you are talking about.

 

[RAVEN]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

Jesus Christ, that is a stupid take. The law doesn't care if it is semi-automatic, bolt action, or a muzzle loader. It specifically says to be counted as a long rifle the barrel must be 16" in length and 25" long from butt to muzzle tip. That is it.

Why not try reading the law in question, like I and many others actually did, so you can learn what you are talking about.

I posted him the link TWICE...:/

 

[Dove]

I have a feeling Joe is going to completely ignore every single point and fact that interrupts what he wants to think.

 

[Oerdin]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

No such thing as an "assault weapon" and the AR 15 is a long gun by WI laws.

Well I read an article about the legislators who drafted those laws and one of them who drafted the laws and it was never intended to include weapons like the AR 15.

But traditional hunting rifles.

So I believe that is a misinterpretation of the law and probably deliberate on Judge Schroeder's part.

The Judge was highly criticized by legal scholars for doing so.

He was also criticized for refusing to allow the murdered/injured to be referred to as victims.

I am hopeful that most will realize this kid could have served 60 years and that will deter them from pulling another stunt like this again. Unless they are complete mental tards, which most of them are.

Legally they were not victims, Kyle was the victim. Fact. That you want to lie and pre-judge exactly what the trial was supposed to determine shows you don't know what you are talking about. Why even have a trial if you are going to allow the outcome to be pre-judged?

 

[Dove]

The AR 15 is not considered a 'long gun' in many other countries. It's considered an assault weapon by the Police and the courts.

That's why it's banned in Canada and New Zealand. Norway too.

At very least it's use is heavily restricted where allowed.

No such thing as an "assault weapon" and the AR 15 is a long gun by WI laws.

Well I read an article about the legislators who drafted those laws and one of them who drafted the laws and it was never intended to include weapons like the AR 15.

But traditional hunting rifles.

So I believe that is a misinterpretation of the law and probably deliberate on Judge Schroeder's part.

The Judge was highly criticized by legal scholars for doing so.

He was also criticized for refusing to allow the murdered/injured to be referred to as victims.

I am hopeful that most will realize this kid could have served 60 years and that will deter them from pulling another stunt like this again. Unless they are complete mental tards, which most of them are.

Legally they were not victims, Kyle was the victim. Fact. That you want to lie and pre-judge exactly what the trial was supposed to determine shows you don't know what you are talking about. Why even have a trial if you are going to allow the outcome to be pre-judged?

Because they are fascists. Drooling ass fascists.

As I observed with no nuance. None is needed. Noticing people who want kangaroo court and to deny rights and violate law to imprison an innocent person are drooling fascists isnt like being confused on the difference between having a skateboard and attacking someone with a skateboard.

 

[Blurt]

"Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance".

Boy how TRUE is that. These drooling fascist sociopaths think they can ignore all details and nuance and destroy our rights and politically weaponize the judicial system.

It's like they are either psycho level pathological liars or they are really THIS fucking braindead and dont understand the difference between assault and self defense. Which makes them so stupid they are a danger and threat to the country.

These establishment shills are trying to rile up their mindless base. They know their followers are dumb and easily led by the nose and will accept all kinds of disgusting anti American violence if its framed right. And they know their followers wont check shit. Theyll just go with what they are told.

This ain't even right/left. Its Americans against the corporate political establishment.

That quote explains a lot of their bullshit.

A very nuanced post, Dovey.

It's more an observation. It fits.

It's not like I was making an insane comparison that ignores critical info like "omg we can shoot people with skateboard now!" As if assaulting someone with one is the same as just having it.

Nuance wasnt intended in my observation that none of you understand nuance. Which should be clear and probably is to everyone else.

I'll mark my posts in future so you know what you are reading.

Thanks. I appreciate it.

 

[Dove]

"Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance".

Boy how TRUE is that. These drooling fascist sociopaths think they can ignore all details and nuance and destroy our rights and politically weaponize the judicial system.

It's like they are either psycho level pathological liars or they are really THIS fucking braindead and dont understand the difference between assault and self defense. Which makes them so stupid they are a danger and threat to the country.

These establishment shills are trying to rile up their mindless base. They know their followers are dumb and easily led by the nose and will accept all kinds of disgusting anti American violence if its framed right. And they know their followers wont check shit. Theyll just go with what they are told.

This ain't even right/left. Its Americans against the corporate political establishment.

That quote explains a lot of their bullshit.

A very nuanced post, Dovey.

It's more an observation. It fits.

It's not like I was making an insane comparison that ignores critical info like "omg we can shoot people with skateboard now!" As if assaulting someone with one is the same as just having it.

Nuance wasnt intended in my observation that none of you understand nuance. Which should be clear and probably is to everyone else.

I'll mark my posts in future so you know what you are reading.

Thanks. I appreciate it.

You should.

I'm very well versed in the art of sarcasm and usually I can be pretty mean. But I am somewhat fond of you.

Anytime.

 

[Blurt]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

Jesus Christ, that is a stupid take. The law doesn't care if it is semi-automatic, bolt action, or a muzzle loader. It specifically says to be counted as a long rifle the barrel must be 16" in length and 25" long from butt to muzzle tip. That is it.

Why not try reading the law in question, like I and many others actually did, so you can learn what you are talking about.

I posted him the link TWICE...:/

Raven,

I've already warned Twitterman about this.

I've known Joe for a decade as he daintily traipses about from one forum to another ejaculating all his nonsense over fresh fields.

The man is strictly an emitter, never a receiver. Nothing sways him but the monologue forever unspooling in the fortified recesses of his own mind.

He is a passive-aggressive force of nature to be reckoned with.

Anyone who engages him will lose that battle. Trust me on this.

 

[Joe]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

Jesus Christ, that is a stupid take. The law doesn't care if it is semi-automatic, bolt action, or a muzzle loader. It specifically says to be counted as a long rifle the barrel must be 16" in length and 25" long from butt to muzzle tip. That is it.

Why not try reading the law in question, like I and many others actually did, so you can learn what you are talking about.

I posted him the link TWICE...:/

Raven,

I've already warned Twitterman about this.

I've known Joe for a decade as he daintily traipses about from one forum to another ejaculating all his nonsense over fresh fields.

The man is strictly an emitter, never a receiver. Nothing sways him but the monologue forever unspooling in the fortified recesses of his own mind.

He is a passive-aggressive force of nature to be reckoned with.

Anyone who engages him will lose that battle. Trust me on this.

Blurt, if might ask - why is almost every one of your posts laced with vulgar homoerotic insults?

Are you capable of lobbing insults without it?

Or are your sex change hormones acting up again?

 

[Blurt]

Yes, yes, hormones, wigs, and sex changes, oh my!

Bet you my best pair of Louboutins that you wouldn't have had to run from that bear if you had an AR-15, Joe.

 

[Joe]

Christ.

Lemme know when you guys are done.

In the meantime, I'm gonna go build a house.

The scariest part about racism will always be how hard they fight to protect it.

Yeah I thought this trial revealed the racial divide in the United States & preferential treatment based upon skin color.

But the worst aspect of this trial is how the judge bent over backwards to accommodate the defense.

Namely he appeared to deliberately misinterpret a statute equating a long gun with a semiautomatic rifle. I read an article about the Wisconsin and the legislators who drafted that legislation.

And it was never intended to include assault weapons like the AR 15.

I think Schroeder knew that. But he allowed that exception. In so doing he revealed his bias towards the defence.

And I think based upon that aspect it should be declared a mistrial or at very least there should be legal challenges to that statute and the judge's ruling.

Jesus Christ, that is a stupid take. The law doesn't care if it is semi-automatic, bolt action, or a muzzle loader. It specifically says to be counted as a long rifle the barrel must be 16" in length and 25" long from butt to muzzle tip. That is it.

Why not try reading the law in question, like I and many others actually did, so you can learn what you are talking about.

No, actually that determination of the MR 15 as a long rifle was not set in stone prior to the trial. Do you remember that?

The defense asked the judge for a ruling as whether the MR 15 could be including in the classification as a 'long rifle'.

It was a vague point in the law and the judge set a precedent under Wisconsin Law at that point in the trial by determining the MR15 as a 'long rifle'.

so he in fact ruled in favor of the defense.

And that's the point at which legal scholars and layman like myself saw the obvious.

That's a clear case of judicial bias/preference.

So that was a clear case of subjective bias

 

[Oerdin]

Depends on how big the bear is really. A black bear, sure, but if it was a large grizzly than .223 is likely to only piss it off unless you got a lucky kill switch shot.

 

[Joe]

Yes, yes, hormones, wigs, and sex changes, oh my!

Bet you my best pair of Louboutins that you wouldn't have had to run from that bear if you had an AR-15, Joe.

I don't come to these forums to fight with you Blurt.

You accuse me of picking fights, but in reality you chase me around these forums like a little girl.

Now gowan