Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,416
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
So you're against the Electoral College I see. Fair enoughAnd by wacky woke history you mean I have been in honors history classes since prep school…. your narrative is pervasive.
You preach democracy while simultaneously speaking out against removing the electoral college and claim that it gives too much power to the federal government…. when it already does just that lol. That is ALMOST the craziest bunch of bullshit my eyeballs have read you spew and I’ve seen some doozies over the years…. and I seriously doubt this is a troll. I think you actually believe that you should have more of a say than my vote and I have paid more in taxes in the last 5 years than you will ever make in your life.
So let me ask you how you would ensure the interests of let's say, a wyoming, are maintained at least to some degree in a union of states where many others have 20 times the population?
Do you feel comfortable with NY, Cali, NJ, Ill & Mass deciding the outcome of the next 1000 elections exclusively? And would you still feel that way if you weren't a Californian? A leftist?
Honest question looking for an honest answer
I need to research some of those states like NJ and Mass. I’ve already lived across the river from Illinois and I will say I’ve experienced firsthand why everyone outside of Chi town is considered a FIP ~ fuckin Illinois people.
Or perhaps you could clue me in on why this would be a bad thing….
North & South Dakota get 4 senators that represent fewer than 2 million people total.
CA gets two representing 39 million, totally fair, hmm?