Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[Oerdin]

A great fact filled podcast by actual lawyers.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Biggie Smiles]

 

[Biggie Smiles]

If you can watch this video in it's entirety and still deny that Kyle acted in self defense congratulations you're a piece of shit and you should hang yourself from the nearest tree as soon as possible

 

[Dove]

This reminds me so much about how the left acted in this thread.

They are insane. Fucking gaslighters. And yeah THEY are the ones who involve politics and are total hypocrites.

Could you imagine if these people who think like laid thier oppressive, fucking nazi style "justice system"?

So they are saying anyone who doesnt agree with them just LOVES and worships Kyle and just wishes we could have "murdered" these people as well.

These people are dangerous and psychotic.

Any look at the evidence says Kyle is innocent. Period. These people who want Kyle in jail are trying to punish someone based on partisan politics. They flat out accuse anyone who doesnt parrot THIER version of this bias. And tell people they are horrible murder lovers of they agree Kyle had a right to defend himself. Its fucking evil nazi shit.

I like how they complain about the judge saying they cant call the rioters "victims", and THEY accuse the judge of being unfair wanting to "taint" they jury. Um what? It's a fucking SELF DEFENSE case, calling the victims IS manipulating the jury....the jury is going to decide if those men were victims or not....so no fucking shit the judge said not to call them victims.

They are pissed off the judge is being FAIR. THEY decided Kyle is guilty and they mad they arent getting the bent, going through the motions bullshit trial they want.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Scum on the left is saying America will burn if Kyle walks but they won't dare come down to my neck of the woods and try that shit.

You can bank on that one.

Their asses will get shot and fed to the alligators down here the first night they try.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

 

[Admin.]

 

[Biggie Smiles]

^^^^ white moron

 

[Lokmar]

Aidsman hates niggers now?

 

[Dove]

Aidsman hates niggers now?

His sides marching orders are that the Hispanic kid who shot the white men who were trying to kill him is a sign of.....white supremacy

Which it is. Just not the way they fantasize it is.

 

[Joe]

Rittenhouse Trial to begin soon, expected to last a few weeks:

 

[Joe]

Live footage of the Rittenhouse Trial:

 

[Oerdin]

This is a problem. I don't see the defense team aggressively weeding out the left wing activists. We know BLM infiltraters got on the Chauvin jury by lying.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Jurors already saying they are afraid of the mobs

 

[Oerdin]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

 

[Oerdin]

@LotusBud @Admin.

I challenge both of you to actually watch this video of the original events.

 

[Breakfall]

@LotusBud @Admin.

I challenge both of you to actually watch this video of the original events.

Don’t encourage the cunt. You’re driving her to iron supplements!

 

[Joe]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

 

[Breakfall]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

Oh look at you...at it again. Probably couldn’t get rimmed right at this point because you lack sexuality...

 

[Breakfall]

And I would be right. JesusChrist...

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

Oh look at you...at it again. Probably couldn’t get rimmed right at this point because you lack sexuality...

I lack sexuality because I have an opinion about things? Wow. You are a giant sexist, and I would never fuck you in a million years.

 

[LotusBud]

This reminds me so much about how the left acted in this thread.

They are insane. Fucking gaslighters. And yeah THEY are the ones who involve politics and are total hypocrites.

Could you imagine if these people who think like laid thier oppressive, fucking nazi style "justice system"?

So they are saying anyone who doesnt agree with them just LOVES and worships Kyle and just wishes we could have "murdered" these people as well.

These people are dangerous and psychotic.

Any look at the evidence says Kyle is innocent. Period. These people who want Kyle in jail are trying to punish someone based on partisan politics. They flat out accuse anyone who doesnt parrot THIER version of this bias. And tell people they are horrible murder lovers of they agree Kyle had a right to defend himself. Its fucking evil nazi shit.

I like how they complain about the judge saying they cant call the rioters "victims", and THEY accuse the judge of being unfair wanting to "taint" they jury. Um what? It's a fucking SELF DEFENSE case, calling the victims IS manipulating the jury....the jury is going to decide if those men were victims or not....so no fucking shit the judge said not to call them victims.

They are pissed off the judge is being FAIR. THEY decided Kyle is guilty and they mad they arent getting the bent, going through the motions bullshit trial they want.

Calling them victims because they were killed is manipulating the jury? Yeah, if you're an apologist for murder it is. SMDH. Really, Dove, you're certifiable, along with all the fascists that you align yourself with here.

 

[Joe]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

 

[Dove]

@LotusBud @Admin.

I challenge both of you to actually watch this video of the original events.

You know it doesnt matter to either of them. Kyle is a symbol of everything they believe about thier political opposition and therefore he must be punished.

That's how they see this. There is no regard for humanity or what kind of precedent gets set that puts citizens under the thumb of mobs.

 

[Dove]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

 

[Joe]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

 

[Lokmar]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

 

[Dove]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

There was a full blown riot occurring Joe.

The police and national guard were busy with that. That's a good chunk of why riots are evil because no one in the community can get any help very quickly at all and criminals KNOW this.

People who so misguided they are sympathetic to them have no idea what a nightmare it is for the people who HAVE to live in it and live in the aftermath.

They think shooting a domestic abusing rapist (Blake) who was fighting the police is so unjust. So what do they do? They lay thier violent wrath on the whole community and destroy innocent peoples lives.

And then if someone has to defend themselves from any of these hateful violent savages? They want to weaponize the judicial system. Even though EVERY bit of wrong doing in this entire mess is firmly on the rioters.

They act like they are the only ones who matter and everyone else is just an after thought with no rights.