- Messages
- 13,416
- Location
- Canada
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
However I did prove my point, that definition of a long range rifle prior
rittenhouse trial was not clearly defined under Wisconsin law.
You did not prove Jack Shit.
Post up the law, word for word, if you want to insinuate that it is or was not clearly defined.
well then why did Judge Schroeder himself say that prior to the Kenosha trial that the definition of a long range rifle was murky and that it was only determined at the trial itself?
Clearly there was confusion when the Prosecution and Defense did not agree on this point
"Judge Schroeder himself say that prior to the Kenosha trial that the definition of a long range rifle was murky "
Bullshit, Joe.
There is not any definition of "long range rifle" in Wisconsin State Legislature.
Then why was the Judge trying to determine whether the AR15 fit the definition of a long gun at the Kenosha trial, Prowler?
That was a major point in the trial.
Weren't you watching?
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
However I did prove my point, that definition of a long range rifle prior
rittenhouse trial was not clearly defined under Wisconsin law.
You did not prove Jack Shit.
Post up the law, word for word, if you want to insinuate that it is or was not clearly defined.
well then why did Judge Schroeder himself say that prior to the Kenosha trial that the definition of a long range rifle was murky and that it was only determined at the trial itself?
Clearly there was confusion when the Prosecution and Defense did not agree on this point
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
Why are you interrupting Joe's execution?
You are clueless. Here, I will give you a chance to prove that you understand my argument: State my argument.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
Why are you interrupting Joe's execution?
You are clueless. Here, I will give you a chance to prove that you understand my argument: State my argument.
Sorry, not playing your game.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
Why are you interrupting Joe's execution?
You are clueless. Here, I will give you a chance to prove that you understand my argument: State my argument.
Sorry, not playing your game.
No, you just did.
And you lost.
To make it clear to anyone who might be scrolling through these posts quickly, The Leaker just suggested I was making a "strawman argument". Well, to determine that an argument is a straw man, one would need to know what the argument is.
So I invited The Leaker to state my argument and she backed-down immediately.
First Round KO.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
Why are you interrupting Joe's execution?
You are clueless. Here, I will give you a chance to prove that you understand my argument: State my argument.
Sorry, not playing your game.
No, you just did.
And you lost.
To make it clear to anyone who might be scrolling through these posts quickly, The Leaker just suggested I was making a "strawman argument". Well, to determine that an argument is a straw man, one would need to know what the argument is.
So I invited The Leaker to state my argument and she backed-down immediately.
First Round KO.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
Why are you interrupting Joe's execution?
You are clueless. Here, I will give you a chance to prove that you understand my argument: State my argument.
Sorry, not playing your game.
No, you just did.
And you lost.
To make it clear to anyone who might be scrolling through these posts quickly, The Leaker just suggested I was making a "strawman argument". Well, to determine that an argument is a straw man, one would need to know what the argument is.
So I invited The Leaker to state my argument and she backed-down immediately.
First Round KO.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
Woah!
Well thanks for that little tidbit of trivia!
Hahahaha!!!
What is should do is awaken you to your strawman argument.
Why are you interrupting Joe's execution?
You are clueless. Here, I will give you a chance to prove that you understand my argument: State my argument.
Sorry, not playing your game.
No, you just did.
And you lost.
To make it clear to anyone who might be scrolling through these posts quickly, The Leaker just suggested I was making a "strawman argument". Well, to determine that an argument is a straw man, one would need to know what the argument is.
So I invited The Leaker to state my argument and she backed-down immediately.
First Round KO.
:facepalm:
No, but I'm certain it's being worked on.
No, but I'm certain it's being worked on.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
They all do that often. Twist your points and fail to grasp the argument.
Killed with an AR15:
Killed with a baseball bat:
Those headlines aren't nearly as common in the US as headlines about individuals being murdered with firearms.
But they serve to underscore the fact we humans are a violent bunch of primates.
Now or course in the USA, the AR15 is considered a 'long rifle' in many US states but in Canada and in other nations/jursidictions it is not for the reasons I've citied. It is clearly defined as 'an assault weapon'.
Where does it say it is a "long rifle" in the legislature, Joe?
And I am pretty sure the AR 15 it is not clearly defined anywhere as "an assault weapon". I think Canadian law has used some fucked-up term like "assault-style weapon" or something vague like that.
And why did you not answer my question about the hunting rifle I posted, Joe?
Well the RCMP in Canada have actually referred to the AR 15 or M16 as an assault weapon and it is prohibited here, Prowler.
So that term must be part of federal legislation written into law as well.
I'll dig a bit further if you want, but the police here have referred to as prohibited assault weapon on their website.
"I'll dig a bit further if you want" Sure, just a quick link to their official Web site would be good.
Where does it say it is a "long rifle" in the Wisconsin State Legislature, Joe?
Why did you not answer my question about the hunting rifle I posted, Joe?
Yeah, Holidork does that quite a bitOld fart talks to himself. LOLOLOL
They all do that often. Twist your points and fail to grasp the argument.
But she did even try to twist a point I made.
She made a weak claim of absolutely no substance, and I called her on it.
Which resulted in an Immediate retreat!!!
Hahaha!!
Think about this: Of all the fallacies she could have claimed, she claimed "straw man".
And then she could not state my argument.
Straw man.
And then she could not state my argument.
Straw.
Man.
The VERY rare times shes ever admitted shes wrong?
Sorry, not playing your game.