- Messages
- 46,768
- Location
- United states
Hey Joe....
wait for it.....
wait....
For.....
it....
And so if thousands of people start protesting in the streets demanding that a trial take place and it results in even more unrest, do you ignore them dumbass?
and what about the relatives of protesters injured or killed in Kenosha?
do you ignore their demands for a trial as well?
What do you do about them, dumb ass?
Christ I'd hate to see you at the helm.
There'd be 10 moe Kenoshas not one.
1. YES you do. Joe you were worried about democracy and you think we should have mob justice?
A bunch of people who are in a mob mentality cannot just demand someones RIGHTS are stripped. We have individual constitutional rights. You dont lose those rights because of a mob....that's not how the country or justice system works. And if it did, it would be awful.
2. What? Relatives of protesters? Joe if their relative went to another community to burn shit down and attacked an innocent person? No one needs to worry about them. Their relative isn't above the law, isnt entitled to inflict violence on others. Maybe the relatives should apologize to the community there kin attacked.
3. Yes, mobs do not get to dictate a trial. So much for due process, than? Didnt you say you cared about due process? Again mobs do not get to demand a person's rights are stripped. People are innocent until proven guilty. Everyone gets their day in court. Mobs do not run this country and demand how the judicial system works.
People need to educated themselves on how the system works and what the laws are and what rights we are have. That's a personal responsibility. Mobs attacking towns is domestic terror. Mobs attacking trials and demanding to influence them and bypass due process is domestic terror.
People who try to stalk and intimidate juries to influence a verdict belong in prison. Period.
4. We do the same thing we always do. Crowd control and protecting the juries.
But they dont get to high jack the judicial system and enforce mob justice. And I'm not sure why you think that's a good idea.
If mobs demand a trial take place but the one charged enters a plea deal? Well there isnt going to be a trial. People have rights and even when charged those rights need to be upheld.
If they dont like the laws there are ways to change things that dont involve acts of domestic terror. The peoples votes are how laws pass. Instead of mobbing and being ignorant and violent....they should get educated on the system, laws and rights and move through the proper channels provided to our Republic that allows us to run our government. They are there.
But you can't ignore that 3 people died that night.
there still has to be a trail whether you like or despise Kyle's adverseries.
Otherwise it's like following the example of a totalitarian society where bodies disappear in the middle of the night no questions asked in the morning.
The USA is stilll a democracy, so these facts cannot ignored.
Maybe North Korea or China but not the US.
2 people died Joe. Not 3. And when you talk about the two people that died? You can't ignore the fact that if they didnt attack an innocent member of the community they actively attacking....they'd be alive.
They are dead because they attacked someone and made him feel reasonably that his life was danger.
And the entire thing is on video from several angles.
Maybe if people value their lives.....they should not engage in acts of war on American communities?
And no, Joe. This should not had been charged. I'm not saying that because I despise shit bags. I'm saying that because it's a fact. You may be saying otherwise because you dislike Kyle. But what I'm saying is a fact. When people turn themselves in after killing in self defense, the police conduct an investigation. If they establish it was self defense? There are no charges brought. None. So no trial is had.
This is a fact and you are free to check. It's just how it works. It has nothing to do with my feelings. Again I have been telling you to work on being objective and look at facts.
Charges were brought against Kyle within days. Even Democrat Tulsi Gabbart addressed this
She is absolutely right. And in order to prevent partisan maliscious prosecutions motivated by politics Kyle's Law is being presented
"
Too often, rogue prosecutors bring felony criminal charges against people who were clearly doing nothing more than defending themselves, their families, or others from violent criminal attack.
We’ve seen this happen in the George Zimmerman trial in Florida a decade ago, in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial just completed in Kenosha WI, and in plenty of cases in between.
These are cases where there is little or no evidence inconsistent with self-defense, such that there can no good-faith reason for a prosecutor to drag that defender to trial. The only motivation of the prosecutor is personal aggrandizement and political capital.
The real problem here is that these trials are a win-win for these rogue, politically motivated prosecutors. If the trial ends in a conviction, they won the legal case.
Even if the trial ends in an acquittal, however, as the George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse trials did, the prosecutor still wins, in the form of political capital and esteem from their own social and political community. They at least “fought the good fight” as their team sees it.
With a win either way there exists zero disincentives for prosecutors to bring felony charges even in self-defense cases where the evidence and law overwhelmingly favor the defendant, and an actual conviction is all but impossible.
The consequences for the clearly innocent defender, however, are catastrophic no matter how strong his case of self-defense. For the lawful defender who finds himself the target of a rogue, politically motivated prosecutor, it’s a lose-lose."
Please stop letting your personal feelings about Kyle(which are no doubt heavily influenced by the sleazy and dishonest propaganda campaign the elites launched) stop you from being objective.