No ur gayno yuoSeriously dude. You’re the biggest dick licker on the west coastSeriously, dude, I don't care about your deeply closeted (or not?) desires, I just don't swing that way. Not that there's anything wrong with having frequent libidinous man to man(+?) sexual escapades.Do you think it's Kamala's husband making you mess your underpants when your asleep? NTTAWWT.
Meme for the meme gods.
Been down that road huh? Ewwww
Wayne Lapierre needs your hard earned cash now, contribute now and contribute oftenly!No ur gayno yuoSeriously dude. You’re the biggest dick licker on the west coastSeriously, dude, I don't care about your deeply closeted (or not?) desires, I just don't swing that way. Not that there's anything wrong with having frequent libidinous man to man(+?) sexual escapades.Do you think it's Kamala's husband making you mess your underpants when your asleep? NTTAWWT.
Meme for the meme gods.
Been down that road huh? Ewwww
Wayne Lapierre needs your hard earned cash now, contribute now and contribute oftenly!No ur gayno yuoSeriously dude. You’re the biggest dick licker on the west coastSeriously, dude, I don't care about your deeply closeted (or not?) desires, I just don't swing that way. Not that there's anything wrong with having frequent libidinous man to man(+?) sexual escapades.Do you think it's Kamala's husband making you mess your underpants when your asleep? NTTAWWT.
Meme for the meme gods.
Been down that road huh? Ewwww
You know, Bigly - no one spends the time imagining homosexual sex that you do who isn't gayer than gay.Wayne Lapierre needs your hard earned cash now, contribute now and contribute oftenly!No ur gayno yuoSeriously dude. You’re the biggest dick licker on the west coastSeriously, dude, I don't care about your deeply closeted (or not?) desires, I just don't swing that way. Not that there's anything wrong with having frequent libidinous man to man(+?) sexual escapades.Do you think it's Kamala's husband making you mess your underpants when your asleep? NTTAWWT.
Meme for the meme gods.
Been down that road huh? Ewwww
Are you dreaming about a young stallion nutting in your mouth again?
And what motherfucking difference does THAT make? He was in illegal possession of said cosplay gun.
Kyle had zero reason to be there, he was not legal to be carrying the firearm he used to kill with,
Its a clear cut case of Self Defense. He was being pursued by a gunman who fired the first shot, Kyle gonna walk, FACT!
Nobody should go free for killing someone else.
I'd say the same thing if the ANTIFA types survived and Kyle was the one who was shot and killed.
No one should face legal penalties if they have to shoot someone in self defense.
That's like forcing someone to be legally obligated to allow themselves to be brutalized or murdered and let the law deal with it after the fact.
That's tyranny and an infringement upon ones actual agency/autonomy
I have the right to defend my body and my life against any aggressor.
Enough of this enabling rhetoric in favor of violent criminals.
The rioters had zero reason to be there and I dont see a single fucking one of you condemning how that town was literally attacked and destroyed.
And I'm not sorry.....but you dont forfeit your right to self defense because you "had no business being there".
Would you say that to a woman who was raped? "Deerrr you shouldnt have been there"
Kyle had more of a right to be there than the rioters did.....but either way? He still has the right to defend himself.
That's the law. I think it's sad that you think domestic terrorists should be given more rights than regular people.
These savages tried to burn down a building that had kids inside. You guys dont care one bit. You apparently only care if someone defends themselves.
Sorry if documented facts fuck up your wet dream.
You know, Bigly - no one spends the time imagining homosexual sex that you do who isn't gayer than gay.Wayne Lapierre needs your hard earned cash now, contribute now and contribute oftenly!No ur gayno yuoSeriously dude. You’re the biggest dick licker on the west coastSeriously, dude, I don't care about your deeply closeted (or not?) desires, I just don't swing that way. Not that there's anything wrong with having frequent libidinous man to man(+?) sexual escapades.Do you think it's Kamala's husband making you mess your underpants when your asleep? NTTAWWT.
Meme for the meme gods.
Been down that road huh? Ewwww
Are you dreaming about a young stallion nutting in your mouth again?
You are easily the biglyest (and perhaps most diminutive at the same time) homo on the internets.
I'm not your intern faggott, but I'm boored, so here's a couple out of 9 gazillion google results...
Kyle had zero reason to be there, he was not legal to be carrying the firearm he used to kill with,
Its a clear cut case of Self Defense. He was being pursued by a gunman who fired the first shot, Kyle gonna walk, FACT!
Nobody should go free for killing someone else.
I'd say the same thing if the ANTIFA types survived and Kyle was the one who was shot and killed.
No one should face legal penalties if they have to shoot someone in self defense.
That's like forcing someone to be legally obligated to allow themselves to be brutalized or murdered and let the law deal with it after the fact.
That's tyranny and an infringement upon ones actual agency/autonomy
I have the right to defend my body and my life against any aggressor.
Enough of this enabling rhetoric in favor of violent criminals.
The rioters had zero reason to be there and I dont see a single fucking one of you condemning how that town was literally attacked and destroyed.
And I'm not sorry.....but you dont forfeit your right to self defense because you "had no business being there".
Would you say that to a woman who was raped? "Deerrr you shouldnt have been there"
Kyle had more of a right to be there than the rioters did.....but either way? He still has the right to defend himself.
That's the law. I think it's sad that you think domestic terrorists should be given more rights than regular people.
These savages tried to burn down a building that had kids inside. You guys dont care one bit. You apparently only care if someone defends themselves.
I'm sorry I guess I missed your 'zecutive order overturn the bill of rights. Who reminds you to breathe in and breathe out????
Still stoopit...git smahterr.
Its a clear cut case of Self Defense. He was being pursued by a gunman who fired the first shot, Kyle gonna walk, FACT!
Nobody should go free for killing someone else.
I'd say the same thing if the ANTIFA types survived and Kyle was the one who was shot and killed.
No one should face legal penalties if they have to shoot someone in self defense.
That's like forcing someone to be legally obligated to allow themselves to be brutalized or murdered and let the law deal with it after the fact.
That's tyranny and an infringement upon ones actual agency/autonomy
I have the right to defend my body and my life against any aggressor.
Enough of this enabling rhetoric in favor of violent criminals.
I don't know if he was really acting in self defense.
Rittenhouse chose to be in a place where he shouldn't have been, plus he was in illegal possession of a firearm.
So he's got a couple of strikes against him.
However, I don't have much sympathy for at least one of his victims - that guy Rosenbloom
He seemed like a real shit disturber/professional protester. who looked for rights wherever he went.
And he finally met his match.
Don't know about the other guy Rittenhouse shot tho.
May or may not have been illegally in possession and even if illegal, which it may not have been, it is just a misdemeanor worthy of nothing more than a ticket. That has been covered multiple times. As for being out in public, I agree it would have been better if everyone stayed home but simply being out in public is not a crime nor is carrying a rifle in public a crime as long as certain requirements are met.
As for if it was self defense or not I can post break down videos moment by moment to prove it absolutely was without question.
Its a clear cut case of Self Defense. He was being pursued by a gunman who fired the first shot, Kyle gonna walk, FACT!
Nobody should go free for killing someone else.
I'd say the same thing if the ANTIFA types survived and Kyle was the one who was shot and killed.
No one should face legal penalties if they have to shoot someone in self defense.
That's like forcing someone to be legally obligated to allow themselves to be brutalized or murdered and let the law deal with it after the fact.
That's tyranny and an infringement upon ones actual agency/autonomy
I have the right to defend my body and my life against any aggressor.
Enough of this enabling rhetoric in favor of violent criminals.
I don't know if he was really acting in self defense.
Rittenhouse chose to be in a place where he shouldn't have been, plus he was in illegal possession of a firearm.
So he's got a couple of strikes against him.
However, I don't have much sympathy for at least one of his victims - that guy Rosenbloom
He seemed like a real shit disturber/professional protester. who looked for rights wherever he went.
And he finally met his match.
Don't know about the other guy Rittenhouse shot tho.
May or may not have been illegally in possession and even if illegal, which it may not have been, it is just a misdemeanor worthy of nothing more than a ticket. That has been covered multiple times. As for being out in public, I agree it would have been better if everyone stayed home but simply being out in public is not a crime nor is carrying a rifle in public a crime as long as certain requirements are met.
As for if it was self defense or not I can post break down videos moment by moment to prove it absolutely was without question.
Bullshit. I've seen those "absolutely without question" videos, and they are in no way "absolutely without question." You see what you want to see through partisan eyes.
