Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
More fighting isn’t the answer…

Or legalizing AR15's for 16 year olds without the need for criminal checks or even licensing.

Geez no wonder the homicide rate is so high in America.

They allow any Dylan Roof, Nicholas Cruz or Kyle Rittenhouse to get a weapon no questions asked.

If I was gonna subscribe to a gun culture it'd be Switzerland's where a person spends 3 years in the army & then they get their gun after they've served their apprenticeship.

Kinda like this maybe?





Joe no one "legalized" anything. It was already LEGAL and the judge upheld the law.

And now you are trying to compare an innocent kid who shot in self defense to Dylan fucking Roof? Like this is the same thing?

Joe I feel like you are intentionally ignoring facts and other cases that contradict the bias conclusion you want to draw.

It's literally insane to put Rittenhouse on a list with criminal murderers. Especailly when those murderers are more comparable to the men who attacked Kyle that night.

You got a mob of established criminals with violent histories rioting in a small town and your concern isnt that.... it's the innocent people who might have LEGAL guns and may defend themselves legally.

It's just baffling. This is a very deep political bias.


Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.

I know you have a lot invested in that Kid but I don't.


He is though. The law says so as did the jury.

He didnt break any laws. And no....Joe, innocent people are not "just as guilty" as radical terrorists because they were trying to protect themselves for violence.

That's just garbage and a shameful view. Fitting for people who think that psycho plowing into families at a parade is "karma".

You dont attack people and say they are just as guilty because they protected themselves. That's not reality.

And I'm still waiting for your two cents on those other self defense cases.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.
Jury said otherwise, fuckwit :)

Insanely heartless to accuse innocent people who were literally attacked by criminals as being "just as guilty" because you are so bias you cant let go of partisan nonsense.

The lack of common sense, critical thinking and civil discourse guarantees the fall of western civilization. We are 3rd worlding.

How many generations of brainwashing and dumbing down did it take. Like 3?
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.
Jury said otherwise, fuckwit :)

It was a fixed trial anyways as Judge Schroeder wanted his 'son' Kyle to be acquitted at all costs.

No, it was not "fixed" trial.

So you are really gonna go conspiracy level with this because you personally dont like WI laws or people defending themselves? And now you are projecting your bias onto the judge because YOU want Kyle guilty.

Cite the laws he broke.

Good grief. No one can be objective anymore.
 
Last edited:

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
The differences between Kyle and OJ?

We have the entire incident on video and you can legit SEE him being attacked and defending himself.

These people are so hateful they are stupid. If they ever manage to succeed in taking over and canning our rights? So long to real justice. It will all be political. We will have innocent people getting absurd prison sentences and rapists and murders walking the streets all based on ideology and bias.

These people wouldnt survive the gulags they want to help build.

These people are insane, blood thirsty pieces of shit. Is there anything they DONT try to weaponize?
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Messages
45,498
you'd have to be a brain dead moron to convict kyle with all the video evidence proving what actually happened
 

RAVEN

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter
Messages
6,595
Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.
Jury said otherwise, fuckwit :)


OJ is innocent! He didn't murder Nichole Brown Simpson, the jury said INNOCENT!!!
and?

Juries aren't infallible. This is not a difficult concept.
You can look at the evidence in this case, Lilly and see it was self-defense. You don't like the outcome because of POLITICS..
 

Lily

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
46,911
Location
De donde me da la gana.
Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.
Jury said otherwise, fuckwit :)


OJ is innocent! He didn't murder Nichole Brown Simpson, the jury said INNOCENT!!!
and?

Juries aren't infallible. This is not a difficult concept.
You can look at the evidence in this case, Lilly and see it was self-defense. You don't like the outcome because of POLITICS..

Untrue. I can accept the verdict and still despise the kid. It's called nuance.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.
Jury said otherwise, fuckwit :)


OJ is innocent! He didn't murder Nichole Brown Simpson, the jury said INNOCENT!!!
and?

Juries aren't infallible. This is not a difficult concept.
You can look at the evidence in this case, Lilly and see it was self-defense. You don't like the outcome because of POLITICS..

And the unhinged and unwarranted hate for this kid.

It's just sick. All because of politics.
 

X

xXx
Site Supporter
Messages
41,736
Location
here
More fighting isn’t the answer…

Or legalizing AR15's for 16 year olds without the need for criminal checks or even licensing.

Geez no wonder the homicide rate is so high in America.

They allow any Dylan Roof, Nicholas Cruz or Kyle Rittenhouse to get a weapon no questions asked.

If I was gonna subscribe to a gun culture it'd be Switzerland's where a person spends 3 years in the army & then they get their gun after they've served their apprenticeship.

Kinda like this maybe?





Joe no one "legalized" anything. It was already LEGAL and the judge upheld the law.

And now you are trying to compare an innocent kid who shot in self defense to Dylan fucking Roof? Like this is the same thing?

Joe I feel like you are intentionally ignoring facts and other cases that contradict the bias conclusion you want to draw.

It's literally insane to put Rittenhouse on a list with criminal murderers. Especailly when those murderers are more comparable to the men who attacked Kyle that night.

You got a mob of established criminals with violent histories rioting in a small town and your concern isnt that.... it's the innocent people who might have LEGAL guns and may defend themselves legally.

It's just baffling. This is a very deep political bias.


Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.

I know you have a lot invested in that Kid but I don't.

I think it's pathetic when people start worshipping a teenager who's killed people just it is for them on the BLM side to elevate a career criminal like George Floyd to martyr status

Neither is a role model to me.

They're not my idea of a hero.



you have to be a fanatic to get it, they don't see they're just as bad as BLM
 

The Prowler

Factory Bastard
Messages
11,173
Location
Canada
what in the world compelled you to answer every single one ?? :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

No .... you're DEF not TRIGGERED !!

I could explain, but you would not understand.

But the results speak for themselves.

Let me bring your attention to the response that my post evoked:

Prowler, Here's what Schroeder himself stated - that he was uncertain about the statute:

"I think it ought to have been mighty clear that I had big problems with this statute," Schroeder said. "I made no bones about that from the beginning. And there always was access to the court of appeals all along here. Well, I guess that's not fair for me to say because I was sitting on it. So shame on me."

That was the first time Joe took an actual quote from the judge instead of just parroting someone else's interpretation of what the judge said or did.

It opened the door for me to speak directly to one of his points in my next post. By posting The Truth, I may be able to enlighten some of you.

I am not sure that I will be able to help Joe overcome the cognitive dissonance that he struggles with, but I have a lot of fun trying.

A piece of wisdom that was passed my way a day or two ago: "Yeah but if you straight up say that, instead of explaining really slowly and precisely, they won't believe you "
 

X

xXx
Site Supporter
Messages
41,736
Location
here
what in the world compelled you to answer every single one ?? :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

No .... you're DEF not TRIGGERED !!

I could explain, but you would not understand.

But the results speak for themselves.

Let me bring your attention to the response that my post evoked:

Prowler, Here's what Schroeder himself stated - that he was uncertain about the statute:

"I think it ought to have been mighty clear that I had big problems with this statute," Schroeder said. "I made no bones about that from the beginning. And there always was access to the court of appeals all along here. Well, I guess that's not fair for me to say because I was sitting on it. So shame on me."

That was the first time Joe took an actual quote from the judge instead of just parroting someone else's interpretation of what the judge said or did.

It opened the door for me to speak directly to one of his points in my next post. By posting The Truth, I may be able to enlighten some of you.

I am not sure that I will be able to help Joe overcome the cognitive dissonance that he struggles with, but I have a lot of fun trying.

A piece of wisdom that was passed my way a day or two ago: "Yeah but if you straight up say that, instead of explaining really slowly and precisely, they won't believe you "


what exactly do you prowl ?? mens bung holes ?
 

X

xXx
Site Supporter
Messages
41,736
Location
here
Kyle isn't innocent any more than the rioters were.
Jury said otherwise, fuckwit :)


OJ is innocent! He didn't murder Nichole Brown Simpson, the jury said INNOCENT!!!
and?

Juries aren't infallible. This is not a difficult concept.
You can look at the evidence in this case, Lilly and see it was self-defense. You don't like the outcome because of POLITICS..

And the unhinged and unwarranted hate for this kid.

It's just sick. All because of politics.



kID ??

you give your kids assault rifles over there
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
You know people that are THIS hateful and this destructive because of politics dont deserve to be involved.

They are literally ripping the country apart. Weaponizing the judicial system. Declaring war on anyone not aligned with them. They have no care for people at all. Dismissing riots and calling a terrorist attack that killed children "karma".

These people are not Americans. They are a danger and detriment to the country. People shouldnt have such a psychotic level hate for their own country and people in it. Where they can actually see riots destroying communities and support it. And the murder of children.

You cant even talk to these people. They are right and you are dumb and if they cant answer questions or you make a point they cant address they just get angry at you and start spewing hate.

I used to get along with Oak. Then on Jan 6th she texted me this angry "Your people are out of control". Like really?

They've already decided we are headed for civil war. They encourage it with their constant racist hate spread. And what gets me is how they blame other parties or Trump when the whole time its them spreading racist hate, calling people white supremacists, running with the endless propaganda. I think some of them know its lies, but they just hate us so much they go with it.
 

The Prowler

Factory Bastard
Messages
11,173
Location
Canada
they don't flaunt it, intimidate with it

It is not like citizens are out there every day walking around with their rifles. They do it occasionally to remind people of the Laws of the Land.

It sure as fuck does not intimidate me.

If it intimidates you, stay home or go somewhere else for that one day it might happen around you every year or so.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
They BOTH have their fanatical views... no diff

Well, the frequent beheading activity might be a considered a difference by anyone with...oh, I do not know....a head on their shoulders!!!!

Hahahahaha!!!!


stick to prowlin a mens bunghole there proewler

You really need to invest some deep thought into how to know the differences between American men who support the 2A and the Constitution and jihadists.

Comparing peaceful working people to murderous terrorists as if it's the same thing is just really.....really bad judgement.
 

X

xXx
Site Supporter
Messages
41,736
Location
here
they don't flaunt it, intimidate with it

It is not like citizens are out there every day walking around with their rifles. They do it occasionally to remind people of the Laws of the Land.

It sure as fuck does not intimidate me.

If it intimidates you, stay home or go somewhere else for that one day it might happen around you every year or so.



YES SIR AMERICAN MOHAMOUD :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

image
 

Joe

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter
Messages
11,158
what in the world compelled you to answer every single one ?? :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

No .... you're DEF not TRIGGERED !!

I could explain, but you would not understand.

But the results speak for themselves.

Let me bring your attention to the response that my post evoked:

Prowler, Here's what Schroeder himself stated - that he was uncertain about the statute:

"I think it ought to have been mighty clear that I had big problems with this statute," Schroeder said. "I made no bones about that from the beginning. And there always was access to the court of appeals all along here. Well, I guess that's not fair for me to say because I was sitting on it. So shame on me."

That was the first time Joe took an actual quote from the judge instead of just parroting someone else's interpretation of what the judge said or did.

It opened the door for me to speak directly to one of his points in my next post. By posting The Truth, I may be able to enlighten some of you.

I am not sure that I will be able to help Joe overcome the cognitive dissonance that he struggles with, but I have a lot of fun trying.

A piece of wisdom that was passed my way a day or two ago: "Yeah but if you straight up say that, instead of explaining really slowly and precisely, they won't believe you "

...and I have to highlight the quote in Big Red letters because that's what YOU want Prowler.

Just like the autistic kid, you need your daily set routine or your 'needs' fulfilled.

Are you sure you dont have a disability?

I've often thought there's something strange about the way you communicate, especially to LotusBud, Lily or myself

You cant seem to respond like most normal people do.

And you seem to get so upset quite often.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,188
Location
United states
what in the world compelled you to answer every single one ?? :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

No .... you're DEF not TRIGGERED !!

I could explain, but you would not understand.

But the results speak for themselves.

Let me bring your attention to the response that my post evoked:

Prowler, Here's what Schroeder himself stated - that he was uncertain about the statute:

"I think it ought to have been mighty clear that I had big problems with this statute," Schroeder said. "I made no bones about that from the beginning. And there always was access to the court of appeals all along here. Well, I guess that's not fair for me to say because I was sitting on it. So shame on me."

That was the first time Joe took an actual quote from the judge instead of just parroting someone else's interpretation of what the judge said or did.

It opened the door for me to speak directly to one of his points in my next post. By posting The Truth, I may be able to enlighten some of you.

I am not sure that I will be able to help Joe overcome the cognitive dissonance that he struggles with, but I have a lot of fun trying.

A piece of wisdom that was passed my way a day or two ago: "Yeah but if you straight up say that, instead of explaining really slowly and precisely, they won't believe you "

Raven posted a link twice that went into how they decided to drop the weapons and charge and I even just told him why.

But he wont accept that Kyle was found to be in legal possession. It can be that they measured it and found it was legal.

It has to be a "fixed" trial and bias judge. You know....because the judge didnt convict him anyway because.

And the jury was clearly "fixed". Not that it was a very solid, very obvious case of self defense. They should have convicted him something.

Because God forbid anyone cross the left and walk away unscathed. If you piss them off, you gotta pay for that.