- Reaction score
- 5,644
- Location
- Great Southern Land
Define bad thinking!No, I think I will just keep exposing bad thinking and Lotusbutt constantly does that.

Define bad thinking!No, I think I will just keep exposing bad thinking and Lotusbutt constantly does that.
None of my sources are "right wing" at all. These are feminist sources and every case can be confirmed. I checked them myself.
Why are so many men wanting to become 'wome' now, @Dove?
Is it because they can't hack what it takes to be a man?
Broken Family/no Father figure around anymore so they identify with the mother?
Why do you think this is?
A lot of the time it's a fetish. Or legit gender dysphoria.
Plus there is a alot of marketing behind this as well and pharmaceutical companies are making grotesque amounts of money.
...but don't you think there is something more fundamental than that?
When I was a kid, we didn't have all these boys identifying as girls
Or even wnaint go mate with boys.
Seems it's gone from Straight (1960s.70s) - gay!1980s-200s) - trans.(2010 - present)
Gets more extreme with every passing generation.
Haven't you noticed this yourself?
There have been gay people throughout the history of the world, and cross dressers as well. Come on, Joe. You know better than that.
Define bad thinking!No, I think I will just keep exposing bad thinking and Lotusbutt constantly does that.![]()
I don’t want to read her posts! It might lower my IQ…Define bad thinking!No, I think I will just keep exposing bad thinking and Lotusbutt constantly does that.![]()
Full of logical fallacies and false conclusions. For examples read Lotusbutt's posts. I quoted two examples above.
None of my sources are "right wing" at all. These are feminist sources and every case can be confirmed. I checked them myself.
Why are so many men wanting to become 'wome' now, @Dove?
Is it because they can't hack what it takes to be a man?
Broken Family/no Father figure around anymore so they identify with the mother?
Why do you think this is?
A lot of the time it's a fetish. Or legit gender dysphoria.
Plus there is a alot of marketing behind this as well and pharmaceutical companies are making grotesque amounts of money.
...but don't you think there is something more fundamental than that?
When I was a kid, we didn't have all these boys identifying as girls
Or even wnaint go mate with boys.
Seems it's gone from Straight (1960s.70s) - gay!1980s-200s) - trans.(2010 - present)
Gets more extreme with every passing generation.
Haven't you noticed this yourself?
There have been gay people throughout the history of the world, and cross dressers as well. Come on, Joe. You know better than that.
What we may be seeing is the 'comeback of the eunuchs' or Eunuch subculture which had existed in ancient times up until 19th century Europe.
Major difference between then & now tho was those culture never recognized them as male nor female.
And I think in India they have their own caste.
I don't think modern transgenders should be allowed to call themselives as boys/men or girls/women. But maybe they should be designated a gender of their own much like Eunuchs were in previous civilizations so that they are never confused with men or women.
Perhaps it's impossible to reach this middle ground as neither side seems willing to accept it.
It's because I'm Black, isn't it?My opinion is it's up to the transgendered folks to decide what they want to be called. It shouldn't make any difference to anyone else, really.
None of my sources are "right wing" at all. These are feminist sources and every case can be confirmed. I checked them myself.
Why are so many men wanting to become 'wome' now, @Dove?
Is it because they can't hack what it takes to be a man?
Broken Family/no Father figure around anymore so they identify with the mother?
Why do you think this is?
A lot of the time it's a fetish. Or legit gender dysphoria.
Plus there is a alot of marketing behind this as well and pharmaceutical companies are making grotesque amounts of money.
...but don't you think there is something more fundamental than that?
When I was a kid, we didn't have all these boys identifying as girls
Or even wnaint go mate with boys.
Seems it's gone from Straight (1960s.70s) - gay!1980s-200s) - trans.(2010 - present)
Gets more extreme with every passing generation.
Haven't you noticed this yourself?
There have been gay people throughout the history of the world, and cross dressers as well. Come on, Joe. You know better than that.
What we may be seeing is the 'comeback of the eunuchs' or Eunuch subculture which had existed in ancient times up until 19th century Europe.
Major difference between then & now tho was those culture never recognized them as male nor female.
And I think in India they have their own caste.
I don't think modern transgenders should be allowed to call themselives as boys/men or girls/women. But maybe they should be designated a gender of their own much like Eunuchs were in previous civilizations so that they are never confused with men or women.
Perhaps it's impossible to reach this middle ground as neither side seems willing to accept it.
My opinion is it's up to the transgendered folks to decide what they want to be called. It shouldn't make any difference to anyone else, really.
It's because I'm Black, isn't it?My opinion is it's up to the transgendered folks to decide what they want to be called. It shouldn't make any difference to anyone else, really.
I'm glad that you've recognized my recent transition.Of course.
Remember the good ole days when AIDS was taking out faggots like admin at the rate of 1 every other day?
that was awesome
Murder that's inclusiveRemember the good ole days when AIDS was taking out faggots like admin at the rate of 1 every other day?
that was awesome
But now China figured out a way to create viruses to kill everyone, gay or straight, black, male, female or other, Bigly.
That way no everyone is included & no one is discriminated against.
Murder that's inclusive
nice
Meanwhile libs are consumed with the focus on some backwoods hillbillies who were trespassing in the capitol a year agoMurder that's inclusive
nice
Part of Mao's Great Leap Forward
![]()
...The World will Suffer Equally
ZING!!!!!
None of my sources are "right wing" at all. These are feminist sources and every case can be confirmed. I checked them myself.
Why are so many men wanting to become 'wome' now, @Dove?
Is it because they can't hack what it takes to be a man?
Broken Family/no Father figure around anymore so they identify with the mother?
Why do you think this is?
A lot of the time it's a fetish. Or legit gender dysphoria.
Plus there is a alot of marketing behind this as well and pharmaceutical companies are making grotesque amounts of money.
...but don't you think there is something more fundamental than that?
When I was a kid, we didn't have all these boys identifying as girls
Or even wnaint go mate with boys.
Seems it's gone from Straight (1960s.70s) - gay!1980s-200s) - trans.(2010 - present)
Gets more extreme with every passing generation.
Haven't you noticed this yourself?
There have been gay people throughout the history of the world, and cross dressers as well. Come on, Joe. You know better than that.
What we may be seeing is the 'comeback of the eunuchs' or Eunuch subculture which had existed in ancient times up until 19th century Europe.
Major difference between then & now tho was those culture never recognized them as male nor female.
And I think in India they have their own caste.
I don't think modern transgenders should be allowed to call themselives as boys/men or girls/women. But maybe they should be designated a gender of their own much like Eunuchs were in previous civilizations so that they are never confused with men or women.
Perhaps it's impossible to reach this middle ground as neither side seems willing to accept it.
My opinion is it's up to the transgendered folks to decide what they want to be called. It shouldn't make any difference to anyone else, really.
Thanks, @Breakfall .I don’t want to read her posts! It might lower my IQ…Define bad thinking!No, I think I will just keep exposing bad thinking and Lotusbutt constantly does that.![]()
Full of logical fallacies and false conclusions. For examples read Lotusbutt's posts. I quoted two examples above.![]()