Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[Oerdin]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you imagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Any person who is against a

YES… I said it, you’re racist. For refusing to recognize that systemic racism exists you’re a FUCKING racist of the worst kind.

don't be mad because i pulled your fucking skirt on matters related to criminal law. Yeah, you worked as a fucking receptionist for an ambulance chaser and you may have held manila folders in your hand as you moved them from the attorneys desk to a cabinet somewhere but that hardly makes you qualified to critique a criminal case where the facts are clear and you haven't the slightest scooby what you are talking about.

sorry to be the one to have to shit on your dreams here but you did this to yourself

You wish I was a fucking receptionist lolz

But while we are on this subject…. I scored 100% on my tort law final, which is the core of the bar exam. So, nice try.

I won’t ask you to incriminate yourself by divulging your expert level experience in all things criminal tho. Thank god for that 5th amendment to our constitution.

meanwhile, Tort law has zero relevance to a criminal case and the more you bleat on about it the sillier you look

And if that is not the case somehow, then explain the paradox which occurred when OJ was acquitted in his criminal case yet found legally responsible for the deaths of Nicole and her boyfriend.

should be an easy one since you scored an A+ on your coffee mixing, filing and office cleaning exams

there is duty regardless…

Morally, MAYBE, but in the purest sense of the law in a criminal case not at all. Either you meet the standard of beyond reasonable doubt or you don't. Preponderance of evidence doesn't even come close

awww how cute… the professional couch juror can google

I can also wager 1000 bucks on the confidence of my analysis.

Can you do the same?

ooops.

not when you get all Dovid about it.

I'm going with a solid 3 on that dismount

it was cringeworthy

 

[Murdy]

@Biggie Smiles ~ the purpose of a friendly wager is that it remains “friendly”

You have seriously insulted my integrity while degrading me as a woman in some lame attempt to gain leverage in an otherwise decent argument. Sorry, no thanks!

 

[Murdy]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you inagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

This is painful.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you inagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

wait wait... I have the answer to that.



It's around here somewhere




just a second




Ah yes, here it it! SYSTEMIC RACISM!!!!!

 

[Biggie Smiles]

@Biggie Smiles ~ the purpose of a friendly wager is that it remains “friendly”

You have seriously insulted my integrity while degrading me as a woman in some lame attempt to gain leverage in an otherwise decent argument. Sorry, no thanks!

I see.

Because anyone with a modicum of intelligence can't go back through the thread and see what actually took place for themselves

Have I violated your preferred pronouns as well?

that dismount gets a 2.

 

[Holliday1881]

Figured since cock licking adumb brought Malcolm X into the mix we should have some full context on how the man actually felt

You know - what Malcolm said when asked what white people could do to help was

Stand aside.

.. I've taken that to be the best stance. That's why I leave Black causes to Black people.
Of course little kids like you weren't alive when he said that, and since you haven't come across the youtube vid it mentions that you just take cherry picked clips to be the whole TROOF.

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

So you're saying you like Kyle because he is also into blondage and disapline?

One only wonders what combat video game Oderstink was referring to.

Did I make you cry again, Oderstink?

How many tears is that today? Humh

 

[Biggie Smiles]

You know - what Malcolm said when asked what white people could do to help was

Stand aside.

.. I've taken that to be the best stance. That's why I leave Black causes to Black people.

Do you now?

Well that's something we can agree upon then.

Only one question remains tho. How exactly did Malcolm, systemic racism and BLM gain entry into a thread about the merits of a self defense argument alleged by a young white boy killed two white men and wounded a third?

take your time

 

[Joe]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

 

[Dove]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you imagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

Total waste of time.

Several people showed her the second video of Jacob Blake fighting police and she still sticks to the first media narrative. She wont look at anything. She will argue and name call and not look at a single thing.

In order for her to acknowledge a fact, the corporate media has to report it. She straight up ignores everything.

She is arguing the first media narrative.

 

[Murdy]

@Biggie Smiles ~ the purpose of a friendly wager is that it remains “friendly”

You have seriously insulted my integrity while degrading me as a woman in some lame attempt to gain leverage in an otherwise decent argument. Sorry, no thanks!

I see.

Because anyone with a modicum of intelligence can't go back through the thread and see what actually took place for themselves

Have I violated your preferred pronouns as well?

that dismount gets a 2.

Nice try… but you were crying about Trump losing for months and that the election was a fraud and blah blah blah. I just have more sportsmanship than this since I’m a 2x Little League World Series contender and don’t want to lower my impeccable standards at this phase of the game.

 

[Murdy]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you imagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

Total waste of time.

Several people showed her the second video of Jacob Blake fighting police and she still sticks to the first media narrative. She wont look at anything. She will argue and name call and not look at a single thing.

In order for her to acknowledge a fact, the corporate media has to report it. She straight up ignores everything.

She is arguing the first media narrative.

THe first media narrative was that he was an innocent bystander during a fight between two females and only intervened to de-escalate the altercation and was then run up on and shot mercilessly by police

I seriously don't think anyone is dumb enough to still believe that nonsense

 

[Holliday1881]

You know - what Malcolm said when asked what white people could do to help was

Stand aside.

.. I've taken that to be the best stance. That's why I leave Black causes to Black people.

Do you now?

Well that's something we can agree upon then.

Only one question remains tho. How exactly did Malcolm, systemic racism and BLM gain entry into a thread about the merits of a self defense argument alleged by a young white boy killed two white men and wounded a third?

take your time

Let's see - 1) You brought that in

2) must have skipped over that part.
3) Habeas Corpus. I know - Liberalism sucks, don't it? He gets his day in court.
2.5) It was at a BLM tally that Kyle murdered people.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Nice try… but you were crying about Trump losing for months and that the election was a fraud and blah blah blah.

As opposed to the 4 YEARS of nonstop wailing and gnashing of teeth you liberals engaged in nonstop?

i'd say you just made my argument for me

 

[Biggie Smiles]

You know - what Malcolm said when asked what white people could do to help was

Stand aside.

.. I've taken that to be the best stance. That's why I leave Black causes to Black people.

Do you now?

Well that's something we can agree upon then.

Only one question remains tho. How exactly did Malcolm, systemic racism and BLM gain entry into a thread about the merits of a self defense argument alleged by a young white boy killed two white men and wounded a third?

take your time

Let's see - 1) You brought that in

2) must have skipped over that part.
3) Habeas Corpus. I know - Liberalism sucks, don't it? He gets his day in court.
2.5) It was at a BLM tally that Kyle murdered people.

I brought malcom in?

are you sure about that one?

go back a few pages before you end up making yourself look like more of a dumbass than your inbred parents ever could

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

here we go... on the merry go round

anything to avoid discussing the merits of this case

 

[Dove]

"The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn't taken, tricked or deceived by the white liberal, then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America, the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man." ~ Malcolm X




For the cherry pickers (white shitlibs....cuz you are not liberals) who only take bits of info to use as your hate propaganda but think of yourselves as enlightened righteous heros who call destroying innocent peoples lives "justice".

 

[Murdy]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you imagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

Total waste of time.

Several people showed her the second video of Jacob Blake fighting police and she still sticks to the first media narrative. She wont look at anything. She will argue and name call and not look at a single thing.

In order for her to acknowledge a fact, the corporate media has to report it. She straight up ignores everything.

She is arguing the first media narrative.

^^^ yammering snatch strikes again!

she means I should learn my place and bow to men, ignore my 20+ year legal experience to rely on media obtained cell phone camera footage and blatantly ignore all laws so her boyfriend can claim he wins this argument since he can’t snort an 8 ball and figure it all out

 

[Dove]

You know - what Malcolm said when asked what white people could do to help was

Stand aside.

.. I've taken that to be the best stance. That's why I leave Black causes to Black people.

Do you now?

Well that's something we can agree upon then.

Only one question remains tho. How exactly did Malcolm, systemic racism and BLM gain entry into a thread about the merits of a self defense argument alleged by a young white boy killed two white men and wounded a third?

take your time

Let's see - 1) You brought that in

2) must have skipped over that part.
3) Habeas Corpus. I know - Liberalism sucks, don't it? He gets his day in court.
2.5) It was at a BLM tally that Kyle murdered people.

I brought malcom in?

are you sure about that one?

go back a few pages before you end up making yourself look like more of a dumbass than your inbred parents ever could

Admin brought Malcolm X. Amazingly the quote about how the media will have you hating the wrong people.

No awareness whatsoever.

 

[Oerdin]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

What part of superseding intervening causation are you confused by? Is it the entire philosophy or just the chronology?

That is definitely the case the prosecutor wants to make. He wants to claim that because Kyle may have (but probably not) committed a misdemeanor punishable by a small fine that some how Kyle is responsible for three people attacking him and that he has no right to defend his life. I just don't see a jury of 12 buying that argument.

In any event, he was legally carrying a legal long gun that night so the whole question is mute.

it’s going to be easy since he illegally obtained a weapon

Again. That is completely untrue. Please tell us what you inagine about the rifle and how it was obtained then I will give you the actual facts.

This is painful.

Still waiting though I guess you can't come up with anything so I will tell you the facts. The long rifle was legally purchased by Rittenhouse’s 19 year old friend and coworker Black. It was legally stored by Black in his parent's house in Kenosha. It is legal for a friend to loan a rifle to another friend as long as both can legally possess a rifle. It is legal for a 17 year old to possess a long rifle (but not a compact rifle) if that person has a firearms safety certificate which Kyle did, yes, even without adult supervision. Furthermore, Wisconsin is an open carry state so it was legal to walk down the street with said long rifle.

Which part of this confuses you so much? Where do you wrongly imagine the rifle was illegally obtained?

 

[Oerdin]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

You might remember Zimmerman also rightly walked as he had been attacked and acted in self defense.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

rely on media obtained cell phone camera footage

you mean the same footage the judge, jury and both legal teams will be relying on?

lolz.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

You know - what Malcolm said when asked what white people could do to help was

Stand aside.

.. I've taken that to be the best stance. That's why I leave Black causes to Black people.

Do you now?

Well that's something we can agree upon then.

Only one question remains tho. How exactly did Malcolm, systemic racism and BLM gain entry into a thread about the merits of a self defense argument alleged by a young white boy killed two white men and wounded a third?

take your time

Let's see - 1) You brought that in

2) must have skipped over that part.
3) Habeas Corpus. I know - Liberalism sucks, don't it? He gets his day in court.
2.5) It was at a BLM tally that Kyle murdered people.

I brought malcom in?

are you sure about that one?

go back a few pages before you end up making yourself look like more of a dumbass than your inbred parents ever could

Admin brought Malcolm X. Amazingly the quote about how the media will have you hating the wrong people.

No awareness whatsoever.

it's truly amazing

and people like this are allowed to vote. That's the tragic part

 

[Murdy]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

here we go... on the merry go round

anything to avoid discussing the merits of this case

Wait… so you mean you want to discuss the “merit” of a case where the trial of the minor accused is going to be held in a state where it is against the law for children to carry weapons….

it’s a slam dunk case where I stand.

 

[Dove]

Ahh, do you think that 17 year old is oppressing you?

If I was unarmed, and he was, in the midst of a riot, fuck yeah. Most 17 year olds don’t think. Just like Kyle.

Watch the video because Kyle was extremely refrained with excellent trigger control and muzzle control. A very disaplined young man. He only shot people who physically attacked him, did not shoot at people who put their hands up and backed away, but did shoot the three people who were direct threats to his life and well being.

In combat I saw fellow soldiers who displayed less disapline and situational awareness. He was definitely trained by someone and he remembered his training well.

So you're saying you like Kyle because he is also into blondage and disapline?

Interesting how your mind seems to gravitate towards sex with young boys

we'll have to revisit that one later

He literally posted a Malcolm X quote about how the media will have you hating the wrong people

HE posted that, like its US it applies to. Like he legitimately thinks that doesnt apply to HIM

HOW?

Because he's dreadfully stupid and really is only qualified to discuss matters he excels at. Like sucking cock

These people literally eat up hateful propaganda about thier own countrymen and post it up here like it's true and they have hategasms.

They dehumanize everyone media tells them is the problem.

They still parrot shit that was said about Trump. Now they hate and degrade "anti vaxxers". All based on media. They are repeating the media narrative about Kyle and hoping a kid who defended himself against violent rioters who wanted to kill him goes to prison.

They mindlessly march right in line with the media.

It is TERRIFYING how they could read that quote and NOT realize it's dead on about THEM.

 

[Oerdin]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

1) Because the constitution requires that the right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.

2) I am a military vet with two combat tours. I agree former military are probably better trained than average and would even agree to increased training requirements being mandated. There is still point #1 though.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

here we go... on the merry go round

anything to avoid discussing the merits of this case

Wait… so you mean you want to discuss the “merit” of a case where the trial of the minor accused is going to be held in a state where it is against the law for children to carry weapons….

it’s a slam dunk case where I stand.

Yes, I want to discuss that case. In detail. Wager on the outcome too.

So why are you filibustering so desperately if this is such a slam dunk?

In my mind, if I truly have belittled you or shat on your integrity a 1000 bucks is a very fine way to balance the scales of justice in your favor.

No?

shall we make it 2000.00 then? You know I'm good for it and with you being able to buy 3/5 the state of Florida I can only assume you are too.

are we on?

 

[Holliday1881]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

here we go... on the merry go round

anything to avoid discussing the merits of this case

Wait… so you mean you want to discuss the “merit” of a case where the trial of the minor accused is going to be held in a state where it is against the law for children to carry weapons….

it’s a slam dunk case where I stand.

Well, don't forget - According to him it was his JOB to DEFEND that property.
Even though he was authorized by no one to do so.