Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[Joe]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

1) Because the constitution requires that the right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.

2) I am a military vet with two combat tours. I agree former military are probably better trained than average and would even agree to increased training requirements being mandated. There is still point #1 though.

What's often noticeable is that those who actually served in the military usually don't carry the gun around wherever all the time they go nor do they stock up like they're trying to start a war.

But the insecure fool who wasn't brave enough to serve his country when he was called upon needs 10 or 20 firearms in his basement to prove somehow that hes a man.

I have one and don't feel the need for more. Bi can easily see reasons to own more without resorting to silly nonsense like questioning a person's manhood. One deer hunting which has different needs from bird hunting which has different needs from skeet shooting which has different needs from home defense which has different needs from whatever you can think of. That is before we get to collectors who often seek out vintage, rare, or antique firearms.

Who are we to tell other people what they can and cannot spend their hard earned cash on as long as it is legal?

Personally I think it's a sign of 'stolen valor' to buy an excessive amount of weapons.

It's akin to akin to someone showing up at a military veterans legion dressed in military uniform with a stash of medals they didn't earn.

We actually had some cases like that in Canada btw.

I think the guy was quickly apprehended. No charges were laid but he was warned never to do it again.

I think people who hide behind weapons like that w/o earning that right are not true men.

 

[Oerdin]

Wait... You think legally buying perfectly legal firearms is "stolen valor"? Stolen Valor involves claiming you have military accomplishments which you do not have. Simply legally owning a firearm, or a number of firearms, does not equate to any such thing.

As a combat vet I agree that actual stole Valor is bad.

 

[Dove]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

1) Because the constitution requires that the right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.

2) I am a military vet with two combat tours. I agree former military are probably better trained than average and would even agree to increased training requirements being mandated. There is still point #1 though.

What's often noticeable is that those who actually served in the military usually don't carry the gun around wherever all the time they go nor do they stock up like they're trying to start a war.

But the insecure fool who wasn't brave enough to serve his country when he was called upon needs 10 or 20 firearms in his basement to prove somehow that hes a man.

I have one and don't feel the need for more. Bi can easily see reasons to own more without resorting to silly nonsense like questioning a person's manhood. One deer hunting which has different needs from bird hunting which has different needs from skeet shooting which has different needs from home defense which has different needs from whatever you can think of. That is before we get to collectors who often seek out vintage, rare, or antique firearms.

Who are we to tell other people what they can and cannot spend their hard earned cash on as long as it is legal?

Personally I think it's a sign of 'stolen valor' to buy an excessive amount of weapons.

It's akin to akin to someone showing up at a military veterans legion dressed in military uniform with a stash of medals they didn't earn.

We actually had some cases like that in Canada btw.

I think the guy was quickly apprehended. No charges were laid but he was warned never to do it again.

I think people who hide behind weapons like that w/o earning that right are not true men.

Joe stolen valor is lying about military service.....its not buying guns....lol.

 

[Holliday1881]

Final Werd: Pyre Rottenhouse gonna burn.

 

[Lily]

Final Werd: Pyre Rottenhouse gonna burn.

One hopes. We must return to a civil society, where dissent is peaceful.

 

[Joe]

Wait... You think legally buying perfectly legal firearms is "stolen valor"? Stolen Valor involves claiming you have military accomplishments which you do not have. Simply legally owning a firearm, or a number of firearms, does not equate to any such thing.

As a combat vet I agree that actual stole Valor is bad.

No. I am not opposed to gun ownership for the purposes of self defense and protecting your home and family.

However I question those who brandish superfluous weapons they don't need nor will ever use.

That's what I'm referring to with regards to false manhood or fake valor.

Perhaps that mentality is old fashioned but I'm more inclined to think of the right to own a firearm as something that has to be earned not bought.

 

[LotusBud]

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

here we go... on the merry go round

anything to avoid discussing the merits of this case

Wait… so you mean you want to discuss the “merit” of a case where the trial of the minor accused is going to be held in a state where it is against the law for children to carry weapons….

it’s a slam dunk case where I stand.

Well, don't forget - According to him it was his JOB to DEFEND that property.
Even though he was authorized by no one to do so.

Notice how Fairyday1881 tiptoes away from his original supposition that it was anyone other than one of his fellow cretins that introduced Malcomn into the thread

lolz

this is like shooting fish in a barrel

a friendly bed and then mapping out numerous stipulations AFTER I said yes #SMH

Do you carry a gun around

It was tragic that Kyle had to defend himself but he did nothing wrong. The other guy was just sucked at his job and though race baiting would make him too popular to fire. He was wrong as well as a racist piece of shit.

It is amazing how you always manage to get everything wrong.

Do you carry a gun around?

Not regularly. The last time I regularly carried a gun around was in Iraq. I do own one, know how to use it properly, and practice 3-4 times a year. Given that night was the second night of riots, arson, looting, and violence I can certainly understand why locals would want to be armed. That is only prudent.

Too many idiots carrying guns around in the US.

Places like Switzerland gun ownership is high but many of those people spent time in the military learning to fire and store weapons properly.

The requirements on citizens should be many times more stringent than a trained soldier or military vet.

They dont let anyone get a flying license so why is the States so lenient on gun ownership?

You obviously didn't see how much of an excellent shot Kyle was

so was that other wannabe cop… the Zimmerman slob

here we go... on the merry go round

anything to avoid discussing the merits of this case

Wait… so you mean you want to discuss the “merit” of a case where the trial of the minor accused is going to be held in a state where it is against the law for children to carry weapons….

it’s a slam dunk case where I stand.

Well, don't forget - According to him it was his JOB to DEFEND that property.
Even though he was authorized by no one to do so.

The Constitution does. We have the right to defend private property.

He was asked by the owners.

You know what no one has a right to do? Attack a community of innocent people, destroy property and violently attack people. But all that is okay to you people.....you are just mad that someone defended themselves.

All these bullshit imaginary "rules" that gives these mobs all these specail rights to destroy communities and murder people.....but completely disempowers anyone from protecting the community or thier own bodies.

Such hateful garbage. You are just a mindless hateful apologists of domestic terror. It takes an abnormal, brainwashed amount of hate to defend political violence being inflicted on totally innocent people.

I hope it happens to you guys. I really do. I would LOVE to see riots on YOUR street. See how much you support "justice" when it's a member of YOUR family being drug out of a car and beaten. Or chased by rioters with weapons. You guys enjoy this as long as it happens to communities you just dont fucking care about. None of you give a genuine fuck about anything unless it happens to you.

OMFG this is painful. You do not have the right to defend property with a gun. Some states have questionable law (unclear) pertaining to the home being burned to the ground and being able to protect yourself from that happening since your life would technically be endangered.

You have the right to protect yourself using deadly force while in your home ONLY if your life is threatened.

Murdy, this is a serious question. Do you not understand that people attacked Kyle physically, minutes after threatening to kill him, and that they were the first to fire a gun?

We aren't talking about property here. Also, no, the right to self defense is not restricted only to your home. All three people who got shot physically attacked Kyle before he defended himself.

Why was he there to begin with?

Sure, and that also was perfectly legal. Just as it was legal for out of state protester to be there. What was illegal is when Antifa/BLM started rioting, looting, and attempting to murder people.

It was actually illegal for a minor to be carrying a deadly weapon.

Again. As the judge himself has said the law is contradictory and unclear. He is still officially considering dismissing that charge prior to trial. Even if so, which is probably not true, we are only talking about a misdemeanor with a $25 fine.

Even if you remove the charge of open carry… you still have murder in the first.

All that charge does is compile damages 3x for the victims.

From what I heard the prosecutions whole case is to try to claim Kyle illegally had a weapon so it is some how his fault that people attacked him and tried to murder him. That he some how no longer had a right to self defense. I just don't see a jury buying that especially over a $25 misdemeanor (which the judge still might dismiss: he said he is currently considering dismissal of that charge).

Given the weight of more than 20 primary videos of events, how Kyle retreated and attempted to avoid confrontation every chance he got, that the original two attackers earlier threatened to kill Kyle for simply putting out a dumpster fire which they wanted to push into a gas station to destroy the gas station... Well, it is obvious who the attackers are and whobwas the defender. Just like it is obvious who shot first and who attacked Kyle while he simply tried to flee and stay away from his would be murderers.

It all flows from that. Also remember Ziminski, the man who fired a gun first, who was with Rosenbaum, who shouted (again on video and backed up by several witnesses) "Get him!" to Rosenbaum... Rosenbaum then immediately ran at and attacked Kyle trying to grab his gun. It is not just Kyle who says this but two other witnesses as well. It is a pretty strong case for self defense when faced with imminent great bodily harm or death.

From what you "heard"? Was that from "word on the street" that you "heard" it?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Why was he there to begin with?

It doesn't fucking matter why he was there to begin with. According to Wisconsin legal statue he could have been there dressed in a white robe with a burning cross in hand yelling nigger at everyone he saw while spitting in their faces and as long as he discontinued the aforementioned actions and retreated from any ensuing altercation he's still entitled to self defense despite being the provocateur as clearly outlined in section (b) cited below. Provided of course he reasonably believed those he provoked were intent to do him great bodily harm.

and I'm sorry dear but after witnessing rosenbuam's hostilities towards fellow militia and the fact that this man was one of several crazed lunatics attempting to torpedo a fucking gas station in a densely populated area it's not all that far of a stretch to believe this person is quite possibly of the mindset to do you harm when he is actively chasing you and attempts to grab the barrel of your rifle.


Read the relevant excerpt from the actual statue so that you stop looking so god damned foolish here. I'm trying to help you for crying out loud but this is getting tedious

(2) Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.
(b) The privilege lost by provocation may be regained if the actor in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.

 

[Oerdin]

P

Final Werd: Pyre Rottenhouse gonna burn.

One hopes. We must return to a civil society, where dissent is peaceful.

I certainly agree we should return to a civil society but that ignores violent and hyper partisan lefts are why we have lost a civil society. Just like how leftists have lied and weaponized our judicial system letting leftist criminals walk with no charges but vastly over charging simple crimes by conservatives. At the heart of this matter is how leftist have politicized the judicial system.

That simply must be addressed. Judicial matters must be applied equally for without that we have no rule of law.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

The right to protect yourself from imminent danger does NOT enable you to interject yourself in a riot with a semi automatic weapon and kill people for fucks sake!

It factually does when those specific three people literally tried to murder the individual in question.

so what you’re saying is that Kyle was just walking down the street minding his own business with a semi automatic weapon… and no one had the right to defend themselves against him?

If he's minding his own business what need would you have to defend yourself against him in the first place?

So if a guy is walking down the street in his Gi with a stripped black belt on do you run up to him and punch him in the face preemptively because he more than likely has the ability to kick your ass inside out?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

The right to protect yourself from imminent danger does NOT enable you to interject yourself in a riot with a semi automatic weapon and kill people for fucks sake!

He didn't inject anything. It is perfectly legal to walk down the street just as it is perfectly legal to open carry. Yes, the right to self defense does exist for people who are physically attacking you are cause reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm. It was clear Kyle was in imminent danger and the use of force was justice as the use of force expert said in his testimony last friday.

948.55 Wisconsin legislature disagrees with you

um... missed a very relevant part of the statue

Whoever recklessly stores or leaves a loaded firearm within the reach or easy access of a child is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor if all of the following occur:


Bonus round.

Who's actually guilty of the Class A misdemeanor in the context of this particular legislation ?

a) the parent or person leaving the firearm within access of the child?
b) the child ?
c) The person citing section 948.55 of Wisconsin legislature has significant disabilities when it comes to comprehending simple English?
D) It's time for the person quoting 948.55 of Wisconsin legislature to change the subject to something completely irrelevant because once again they haven't the slightest clue what they are talking about.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Well…. that concludes my lecture today on teaching dipshits how to law. I’m hopeful their cut and paste atrocities will be followed up with a lengthy reading assignment tonight trying to prove me wrong.

I’ll catch you all on the flip side of this electric chair switch!

Don't play yourself dear. If you truly believed any of the nonsense you are trying horrendously to make stick I would have received a text from with your cashapp info so that we could both put our money where our legal analysis abilities are

but you fronted like a store window citing some sorry ass excuse about "stipulations" in our bet as if clarifying what actually constitutes "frying" is somehow unfair to you in particular.

Yeah, cause when the fellas are on the basketball court wagering a game no one thinks to define the winning score as 15 or 21

 

[Dove]

P

Final Werd: Pyre Rottenhouse gonna burn.

One hopes. We must return to a civil society, where dissent is peaceful.

I certainly agree we should return to a civil society but that ignores violent and hyper partisan lefts are why we have lost a civil society. Just like how leftists have lied and weaponized our judicial system letting leftist criminals walk with no charges but vastly over charging simple crimes by conservatives. At the heart of this matter is how leftist have politicized the judicial system.

That simply must be addressed. Judicial matters must be applied equally for without that we have no rule of law.

That's the root issue here.

They are tyrants who are allowing, encouraging and excusing hyper partisan violence and wanting people to "fry" just for crossing them.

Its beyond disgusting. They have completely dehumanized everyone not on thier stupid "side".

When Kyle walks they will screaming about racism. It's all they fucking do.

 

[Oerdin]

Wait... You think legally buying perfectly legal firearms is "stolen valor"? Stolen Valor involves claiming you have military accomplishments which you do not have. Simply legally owning a firearm, or a number of firearms, does not equate to any such thing.

As a combat vet I agree that actual stole Valor is bad.

No. I am not opposed to gun ownership for the purposes of self defense and protecting your home and family.

However I question those who brandish superfluous weapons they don't need nor will ever use.

That's what I'm referring to with regards to false manhood or fake valor.

Perhaps that mentality is old fashioned but I'm more inclined to think of the right to own a firearm as something that has to be earned not bought.

I contend most if not all gun owners will use their firearms and that the vast majority do feel the need for them. Thus why they spent their hard earned money on them. As I said, even just for hunting one may need or feel the need for a half dozen or a dozen different specialized tools. I.E. firearms. I am completely unsure how one "earns" a firearm as it is truly just a tool like any other and people generally buy tools.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

I personally cannot wait to witness the crying and hysterical implosions of the left when this kid walks with a smirk on his face

 

[Oerdin]

I hope you are right. I fear that leftist ideologues will at least cause a hung jury or that juries will be intimidated into an unjust ruling.

 

[Lokmar]

The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.

The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.

It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.

Vigilante justice is against the law.

Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?

Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.

ps tort law is universal in this nation lol

:facepalm:

that’s what I’m doing while reading the hunting laws that they are using for his defense lolz

This kid is gonna fry. Mark my words.

Wanna wager?

how about 1000 dollars?

Sure.

Your on

We’ll exchange cash app info as soon as you text me with a commitment that you’re serious

Christmas bonus early this year for me

Maybe you should buy dinner in Vegas for Dove and I!!!!

 

[Biggie Smiles]

The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.

The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.

It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.

Vigilante justice is against the law.

Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?

Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.

ps tort law is universal in this nation lol

:facepalm:

that’s what I’m doing while reading the hunting laws that they are using for his defense lolz

This kid is gonna fry. Mark my words.

Wanna wager?

how about 1000 dollars?

Sure.

Your on

We’ll exchange cash app info as soon as you text me with a commitment that you’re serious

Christmas bonus early this year for me

Maybe you should buy dinner in Vegas for Dove and I!!!!

I upped the wager to 2000 but she cowered unfortunately

but I could still throw down for a good Vegas dinner

 

[Lokmar]

The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.

The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.

It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.

Vigilante justice is against the law.

Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?

Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.

ps tort law is universal in this nation lol

Funny because the judge in this case admitted that the law is unclear. One law say no one under 18 can own a firearm while another says that a person 17 years of age can legally possess a long rifle if they have a training certificate. Kyle did not own the rifle. His 19 year old friend owned the rifle and legally purchased it as well as legally stored it in his home.

The judge said in the next hearing he will decide whither to dismiss the prosecutions claim that possessing a firearm by a 17 year old was some how illegal.

Clearly the judge is a right wing extremist and part of a cabal of white supremacists.

When Kyle walks that will be the narrative. Incurable hate and ignorance that allows violent riots and only gets mad about "murder" when someone defends themselves against leftwing terrorists are never gonna be reasonable.

He won't walk completely free, Dovey.

However I suspect the Judge will seek some sort of compromise verdict in order to assuage tensions on both sides.

Who cares if he gets off… the whole country is going to burn eventually because of their denial on all things pertaining to racism…

The riots resulted from systemic racism while these epic tards cheer for a facist pig and support a totalitarian dictatorship.

THEY. STILL. DON’T. FUCKING. GET. IT.

Fuk off, nigger luvin whore!!!!

 

[Biggie Smiles]

I hope you are right. I fear that leftist ideologues will at least cause a hung jury or that juries will be intimidated into an unjust ruling.

Legitimate fear considering how these vermin act when they don’t get their way

 

[Lokmar]

Thats Dr Professor Trash to you, faggit!

 

[Joe]

Thats Dr Professor Trash to you, faggit!

There's just too much violence & out of control gun owners in America. ..Lokmeer!

...just way too many!

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Here is another photo of Grosskreutz still holding his glock pistol after he fucked around and found out.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The only person who murdered anyone was Kyle. THE. ONLY. PERSON.

You are making excuses for murder.

Fuck you.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Kyle did not murder anyone. Self defense by law is not murder, dumb ass. Also you are ignoring that Ziminski fired at least two times which can be proven (lots more shots can be heard on the tapes as well) and one of Ziminskis rounds hit Rosenbaum while Ziminski was actively trying to shoot Kyle.

You moron!

You don't get to murder someone who hits you with a plastic bag or a skateboard. Self defense would have been to hit the guys, or push them, or smack them with a skateboard. Not to blow them away with a rifle.

Fuck you.

You are losing, badly, dear. You should try one of Spoonie's patentled dismounts.

The only thing I'm losing is the fight to talk some sense into you dumbasses.

OK, Lotus.

I'm defending a guy who was a lifeguard at the community pool, volunteered his time to scrub graffiti of the walls of the local high school and agreed to help his family friends to defend their property from mobs of hate-filled Registered Democrats who decided to have a riot.

You're defending one of the dead guys that spent time in prison for assfucking little boys.

who's got sense here?

I am not defending anyone for assfucking little boys. I'm sorry that you don't understand that. I am defending everyone's right to not be murdered because some little vigilante thinks he's got the right to muder anyone he chooses. It's simple. Homicide is illegal and immoral.

I would even defend your right to not be murdered at some pro-Trump riot.

Yes you are. You are defending Registered and paid Democrat "activists" who were sent to Kenosha on the orders of your Democrat betters to engage in mayhem and violence in the name of some worthless nog criminal that got himself shot after finger-raping his ex-girlfriend ,who called the cops, who responded to the "domestic violence" incident, during which the inferior and stupid black dumbass got himself shot. (Incidentally, the brave officer who shot the stupid nog criminal was absolved today in court, so all your little paid antifa rioters did it for nothing.)

So, it wasn't a "pro-Trump" riot, dear. It was a manufactured Leftist/Progressive "direct action."

That is what they call it, isn't it?

OMG. I didn't SAY it was a pro-Trump riot, Jethro. I said I would defend YOUR right to not get murdered at a pro-Trump riot. You know, if the whole thing was reversed and there was some liberal Kyle at a pro-Trump riot who was running around murdering MAGA morons. I wouldn't turn that guy into a hero or claim that he was innocent.

Damn, you're slow witted.

Dearheart, I know I'm, like, 12 pages behind here, but you DID say "pro-Trump riot." Any one can read the nested quotes and see you saying just that.

'I would even defend your right to not be murdered at some pro-Trump riot.'

That is your direct quote, sweetheart.

Anyway, I',m gonna start reading the next 11 pages of this thread. Probably won't get through it before some shiny object captures my attention, but that IS why YOU said.

You used to pay moar attention. Do you think menopause is setting in?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

OK. I didn't read the last 11 pages. Did anything interesting happen or have we reached consensus that Kyle Rittenhouse shooting down verminous filth Registered Democrat vermin who were getting paid to commit mayhem and violence was a completely justifiable use of a firearm?

 

[Oerdin]

Thats Dr Professor Trash to you, faggit!

There's just too much violence & out of control gun owners in America. ..Lokmeer!

...just way too many!

I am sorry you hate the constitution but it is, never the less, the Supreme law of the land.

 

[Lokmar]

Thats Dr Professor Trash to you, faggit!

There's just too much violence & out of control gun owners in America. ..Lokmeer!

...just way too many!

Take one guess how many guns I own josephine. Its an even, double digit number.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Thats Dr Professor Trash to you, faggit!

There's just too much violence & out of control gun owners in America. ..Lokmeer!

...just way too many!

Take one guess how many guns I own josephine. Its an even, double digit number.

Lok, buddy.

Hush Puppy!

Never leave any kind of trail to any weapons cache.

Now, split that armory up and hide it right and proper. We might be needing it soon.

 

[Oerdin]

Properly oiled and then double or triple vacuum sealed in plastic itn should last at least 100 years. Better to have and not need than to need and not have I always say. Buried at least 4-6 feet no metal detector should ever pick it up even if someone knew were to look which they won't.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Notice how an actual attorney pretty much outlines exactly what I've said word for word and mentions nothing about Tort

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Criminal defense attorneys discussing the relevant issues at play with respect to the self defense allegation